Beloved and not so beloved dead.

I write this on a day when I have had to turn the radio off. Thankfully we do not have a television, so we have been spared from a good deal of the media frenzy surrounding the death of Margaret Thatcher this week. Having got through BBC Radio 4’s morning news program, just about, the prospect of a day full of obituaries, analysis of her life and work, frankly fills me with rage. It is a rage that seems to bubble up from almost nowhere and which, whilst to put it mildly I never lost any love for the woman, surprises me at its ferocity.

Growing up as I did, a child of Thatcher, born in 1979 the very year the Conservative party won the election and she became prime minister; for the first 10 years of my life, my understanding of politics was entirely shaped by the climate of Thatcher’s Britain. Not only that, but living in a green-liberal household my father standing as liberal candidate for local government, Mrs Thatcher became the closest thing to evil that my small mind could imagine. I was quite genuinely very frightened of her. When I remember the news stories of the time, I can recall the brutal and violent clashes of the miners strikes, the forced removal of the traveller folk, police with batons and riot shields, the soaring interest rates as my parents struggled to pay the mortgage and feed us, CFCs, holes in the ozone layer, famine in Ethiopia, apartheid in South Africa, war in the Falklands, the nuclear fears of the cold war. I didn’t know a child in my class who had not read Lawrence’s Children of the Dust or Swindell’s Brother in the Land . If you haven’t read them, I highly recommend them for the insight they offer into a child’s mind and fears of the time. They paint vivid pictures of a world post nuclear apocalypse. I think I genuinely believed at that time in the inevitability of it all. To a child in 1980’s Britain, the world was a grey and frightening place to be and Margaret Thatcher with her blue suits and strange monotone voice seemed (rightly or wrongly) to be the orchestrator of these things and will in my mind be forever connected.

As an Animist, understanding that we are constantly changing beings, made up of the stories that we gather along the way, it is no surprise that these particular stories have had a hand in creating who I am. If I dig hard enough I can in part trace my deep green environmentalism back to childhood fears of disaster and apocalypse, I am no longer so afraid of nuclear war as I am of climate change. Perhaps I have in some small measure to thank Maggie for my deep, wakeful paganism; determined as I am not to use, abuse and destroy the world in the ways that I witnessed in my childhood.

But, perhaps one of the things that has bothered me the most about the reactions to the death of this woman amongst all the obituaries and political comment, is the reaction to the celebrations. Whilst street parties are perhaps a little on the tasteless side, there has been a very natural outpouring of what I can only really describe as relief, followed by a resultant backlash of those demanding that we show some respect. Yet there is a deep and abiding sense, for those who felt so bitterly the injustices of her time in office, how wonderful it is that she is no longer with us, and it cannot be contained. I spoke to my father the day she died and he told me that he had been grinning for hours. He is not celebrating, not throwing a street party just as I am not, but he feels the relief as palpably as I do, it has shaken us and I was touched by his very human and honest reaction.

I am disturbed by the calls for respect in the hour of her death, because I find deeply uncomfortable the idea that we should never speak ill of the dead for a number of reasons. Firstly, as an ever questioning Druid, I have to ask the question “why not?” What is it about her as a dead person that means that I should suddenly start paying her respect or that I should not laugh at a cartoon strip or poem when I most certainly would have whilst she was alive? Is it that at the moment of death we are magically transformed into something blameless and untouchable? That is certainly not my understanding of the ancestors, within a tradition that acknowledges them as fundamentally human, we understand that there were bastards and rapists and kiddy fiddlers just as there is sweet old granny and granddad. We can’t conveniently forget the less than lovely bits of human nature, sanitising and idealising the past however much we would like to, for it is who we are too. Or, is it that she leaves behind a grieving family whose feelings we should respect? By far the most common complaint is that “she was someone’s daughter, was a mother, a wife… have some respect”. Yet I struggle to understand the significance of this. Surely by virtue of being human she is these things, they are not unique or in themselves particularly noteworthy and her family have certainly handled the vitriol up to this point, the press and public have always lambasted her; I would ague that it goes with the job. If by virtue of having a family we must afford respect to the deceased then let those calling for that respect pay the same dues to Pinochet, Sadam Hussein and Ossama Bin Laden, finding in themselves a deeper sense of compassion for all humanity rather than selected heroes, because after all we will never agree on those and they were all sons, husbands and fathers too. It is entirely appropriate for those who call these controversial figures their beloved dead to mourn them, but I would suggest that is their job not mine.

There is a danger too in this call for silence as Glen Greenwald thoughtfully points out in his article;

“There is absolutely nothing wrong with loathing Margaret Thatcher or any other person with political      influence and power based upon perceived bad acts, and that doesn’t change simply because they die. If anything, it becomes more compelling to commemorate those bad acts upon death as the only antidote against a society erecting a false and jingoistically self-serving history.”

I would suggest that at a time when we are in danger of romanticising Margaret Thatcher’s life beyond all sense of recognition, those who have a different story to tell have the obligation to tell it, to speak out against the mawkish calls for respect and sympathy and remind the nation just why she was so loathed and with such bitterness by so many. Despite loathing her myself, I do not feel any sense of celebration, after all by the end she was just a little old women who had mostly lost her marbles, largely estranged from her daughter, and that is always sad, but I can understand that celebration as a natural reaction and conclusion to an era that left deep scars on so many.

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Beloved and not so beloved dead.

  1. Brian Taylor says:

    I’m also glad that our side of her story is being told. I’m off to see Ken Loach’s ‘Spirit of 45’ tomorrow ( having been born in the very different Britain of those years! ). Did you see Steve Bell’s cartoon in the Guardian? A ghoulish Thatcher being lowered into an open grave asks “Why is this pit still open?”. The only thing that troubles me about the street parties is that rage against what she stands for has once again taken a sexist turn – references to the Bitch, and even Witch! I’m still pondering the questions you raise.

  2. Nimue Brown says:

    Reblogged this on Druid Life and commented:
    Red has covered this topic so well, that I wanted to reblog it. I’d been pondering for a couple of days now how to respond to the death of Margaret Thatcher, and Red has captured so much that resonates, tht I think it makes far more sense to point you at her reflections rather than cobbling together something of my own. Enjoy…

  3. Very well put, as always, Red. Thank you for writing something so thoughtful. As I have said elsewhere: she spoke ill of my dead; I don’t mind speaking ill of her.
    Several of my acquaintances re-posted that Martin Luther King quotation (I will never rejoice in the death of another, etc) which, on any other day, I would have agreed with completely. But I couldn’t help noticing that each person who posted that quotation grew up in a reasonably well-heeled family in South East England. These friends have expressed puzzlement and shock at the palpable sense of relief and even celebration they see from others; I keep having to remind them that this is not an intellectual reaction! It is instinctive, visceral – it is the reaction of people who watched as her government demonised them, ripped the heart out of their communities and left them to continue their “managed decline.”
    There is a lot more to say about the powerful, almost folkloric hold she had over our collective imaginations (imagine, a politician so influential that we can only feel freed from it by her death, even though she left office nearly two decades ago!). But that can wait until the dust has settled.

  4. Thanks all for you comments. I think it important to mention that I was from a well-heeled family from the South of England and it was not at all protective of the Thatcherite influence. We just din’t fare quite so badly as the North.

  5. joannavdh says:

    It is the timing that for me is so wrong – the time for celebration was when she left office, not upon her death. As a Druid with Buddhist Zen tendencies, the celebrations of anyone, enemy or not, is simply unfathomable. Fight Thatcherism, protest her legacy that still remains. I’m not against speaking ill of the dead – but I try not to speak ill of anyone, dead or alive. Instead, work to create peace in the world. Heal the wounds that are still raw after all these years. Who has kept these wounds raw, I would ask? Speak out against behaviour that is abhorrent, stand for those who cannot stand for themselves. However, fight the battle of today, not yesterday. In love and peace. xox

  6. Hi Jo, I have been watching the comments over on your blog the last day or so with interest. I hadnt commented myself because I share the confusion that many have expressed. So completely rooted in the mud and blood of wholey British Druidry, as I am, I have always found eastern mysticism to be confusing, not least the assertion that love and compassion for everything should be what we aim and strive for. Having explored this perspective, I constantly found myself lacking because as a Druid with human tendencies, I couldn’t find that within myself. What I am far more interested in is relationship and the way that emotion, as powers of nature, as our gods, flow through us and around us.I honour anger, grief, fear, hate as I do love. All tell a story of our humanity. To deny those stories is to deny what it is to be human. For me compassion is found within and evolves out of conscious relationship that is crafted and lived. Ultimately we may move through the anger and rage to find peace and compassion, but would suggest that we need to honour and understand that very necessary process. Finally I would askthe question, IS this yesterday’s battle, or are we still fighting the injustices of a society, perpetrated in large part by Thatcherism that the earth and it’s people are a resource to be plundered and used. I would suggest that the fight is still very relevent and is a substantial part of why feelings are still so strong. Honour the process, the journey that we are all on. Perhaps find a little compassion for those still experiencing the rage; harder by far than finding it for a dead woman and her family? X

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s